As the 2020 election approaches, one of the key issues at the forefront of voters’ minds is climate change. With the recent devastation caused by natural disasters such as wildfires and hurricanes, it is more important than ever for the next administration to take decisive action to combat climate change.
In New Jersey, where residents are already feeling the effects of rising sea levels and increased temperatures, the choice between incumbent President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Kamala Harris is crucial. Both candidates have expressed differing views on climate change and have proposed vastly different approaches to addressing the issue.
President Trump, who has famously called climate change a “hoax” in the past, has rolled back numerous environmental regulations during his time in office. He has also expressed support for the coal industry and has pulled the United States out of the Paris Climate Agreement, a global effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
In contrast, Kamala Harris has made combating climate change a central part of her platform. She has proposed investing in renewable energy sources, cutting fossil fuel subsidies, and recommitting the United States to the Paris Climate Agreement. Harris has also been vocal about the need to protect vulnerable communities from the effects of climate change, particularly low-income and minority populations who are disproportionately impacted by environmental issues.
As New Jersey continues to face the challenges of climate change, voters will have to decide which candidate is better equipped to lead the country in addressing this urgent issue. The outcome of the election could have far-reaching implications for not only New Jersey but for the entire country and the world. The choice between Harris and Trump could determine whether the United States takes decisive action to combat climate change or continues down a path of environmental degradation.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com