In a recent report by NJ Spotlight News, the potential impact of lowering the voting age was analyzed. Currently, the voting age in the United States is 18, but there has been growing support for lowering it to 16. Proponents argue that 16 and 17-year-olds are already responsible for many adult activities such as paying taxes and driving, so they should also have a say in the democratic process.
One of the main concerns raised by opponents of lowering the voting age is that younger voters may not be mature or informed enough to make important decisions. However, studies have shown that young voters are just as capable of making informed decisions as older voters, and may even be more likely to vote in local elections.
Lowering the voting age could also have a significant impact on the political landscape. Younger voters tend to lean more liberal, which could potentially shift the balance of power in elections. This could lead to policies that better reflect the interests and concerns of younger generations.
In countries where the voting age has been lowered, such as Scotland and Austria, young voters have been actively engaged and have had a positive impact on the political process. By giving 16 and 17-year-olds the right to vote, it could help to increase voter turnout and promote civic engagement among younger generations.
Overall, lowering the voting age is a contentious issue that has sparked debate among politicians and voters. While there are valid concerns about the maturity and knowledge of younger voters, there is also evidence to suggest that they are capable of making informed decisions. Ultimately, allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to vote could lead to a more inclusive and representative democracy.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com