Trump Signs Executive Order to Dismantle Department of Education, Sparks Outrage among NJ Politicians
On Thursday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at eliminating the U.S. Department of Education, claiming it would restore educational authority to the states. Although the White House acknowledged that Trump lacks the power to shutter the agency entirely, the order instructs Education Secretary Linda McMahon to initiate steps toward its closure.
The announcement triggered a swift backlash from New Jersey politicians, who voiced strong opposition on social media and through public statements. Advocates argue that the elimination of the department poses significant risks to education funding crucial for millions of students in the state, particularly for those from low-income families and students with disabilities. New Jersey relies on approximately $1.2 billion in federal funding, primarily allocated to aid disadvantaged students and support local schools. Critics emphasized that dismantling the department would threaten essential resources and elevate educational costs, ultimately jeopardizing futures for many families.
Rep. Josh Gottheimer highlighted the harmful ramifications, noting that New Jersey annually recoups nearly $1 billion from federal education funds. He asserted that these funds are vital for maintaining educational standards and programs, as cutting them would disproportionately affect underserved communities.
Many elected officials warned that the executive order is not just a political maneuver, but an illegal act, with the power to eliminate the department lying solely with Congress. Legislators from both sides condemned the order’s implications, fearing it would lead to job losses for teachers, diminished resources for classrooms, and increased property taxes.
In response to the outcry, New Jersey leaders vowed to fight against the order, emphasizing that every student deserves equitable access to education. As discussions unfold, the potential for legal challenges looms large.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
